Cop said:
With near 90% of the browser market the motive for innovation was not strongly present, resulting in the 6 year time between the IE6's introduction and its replacement with IE7.
Really?!?!?? That long?!?? Blooming Nora! Sheesh...
Looking at the posts today with less sleepy eyes, its text size is feeling fairly comfortable for me to read (if anything, it's the displayed usernames next to posts that look a touch too small now). Just as well, actually, as altering my browser font size is altering sig size but not main posting text size and if I do another 'ctrl +', all unbolded text looks bolded!
Afraid I'm still with Chris, though, on the background (sorry, very talented Max!
![Smile :) :)]()
). Even though I now know it's meant to be a fly poster-type background, it's not...for me, anyway...'obvious' enough/relevant enough to what psf is about to be that effective. Just speaking personally, it's not really 'saying anything' to me and I'm still slightly scratching my head over what it's about. I think that for someone who didn't read the explanation from Cop on what it was, they might be a bit bewildered as to what it's showing, etc.
I think if going for a fly postery background, it would benefit from being a little less subtle/'obscure'. Maybe there could be some sort of Pleased Sheep-related fly posters stuck on 'wherever' (you can see I haven't thought this through!), with some torn/ripped areas on said fly posters. They could perhaps be spaced/presented in such a way on said 'wherever' to try and put across the 'independence' of the company...and the fact there are ripped sections is also showing how 'torn away' and separate PSF is from the major film companies.
Big apologies if I've caused any offence by the above!
Looking forward to Cop's graphics.
![Smile :) :)]()